What does it mean for a gaze to become a habit? And why, once formed, can that habit never be fully depicted or erased? The enigmatic title Metsuki No Shumi Wa oe – presented as if a software version (V24.12.01) and a catalogue number (RJ01185815) – invites us to consider the uncanny intersection of the human eye’s intimacy and the cold taxonomy of digital archives.

This tension – between the ineffable and the serialized – is the essay’s core. In our current media ecology, we treat attention as a resource and a habit as a dataset. Eye-tracking software measures where we look; algorithms learn our shumi (taste) and feed us more of the same. The gaze becomes reproducible, optimizable, and eventually, erasable with a factory reset. The title’s quiet protest – oe (cannot paint/erase) – stands against this logic. It insists that some ways of seeing, once internalized, leave a trace no version control can revert.

At first glance, the phrase feels classical, almost like a fragment of Edo-period aesthetics: metsuki (eye expression, the way one looks), shumi (taste, habit, predilection), oe (cannot paint, or cannot complete). Together, they suggest that the particular quality of a person’s gaze, once it becomes ingrained as a habit, resists artistic capture. A painter may render the shape of an eye, the iris’s hue, even the tension of a brow, but the habit of looking – the repeated, unconscious signature of another’s attention – slips between representation and reality. It is too intimate for a portrait, too temporal for a photograph.