Nosferatu Today

Unlike the claustrophobic, jagged alleys of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), Nosferatu ’s horror emerges from emptiness . The streets of Wisborg (a fictionalized Wismar) are eerily deserted, cobblestoned arteries devoid of community. The film’s most famous sequence—Orlok rising from his coffin in the ship’s hold—is preceded by shots of the abandoned ship drifting silently into port, its sails like skeletal wings. This is a landscape of post-war anomie. The population is present only in reaction shots of panic; they are a mass, not a society.

When Bram Stoker’s Dracula was published in 1897, it presented a vampire who was a charismatic, if terrifying, aristocrat. Stoker’s Count was a figure of feudal regression, a predator of Victorian drawing-rooms. Twenty-five years later, German director F. W. Murnau, operating within the fertile ground of Weimar cinema’s Expressionist movement, stripped the vampire of its erotic nobility. In its place, he gave us Count Orlok: a bald, rat-faced, long-nailed creature who does not seduce but invades. Orlok is not a lover; he is a plague. Nosferatu

Orlok’s castle is not a romantic ruin but a place of unnatural stillness and vertiginous angles. The shot of Hutter (Gustav von Wangenheim) eating dinner while Orlok reads a contract at the opposite end of a table that seems to stretch infinitely foregrounds the horror of bureaucracy . The vampire is a landlord, a property owner, a signatory. The supernatural horror is thus grounded in the mundane anxieties of the petit-bourgeois employee—Hutter is sent to Transylvania by his boss, Knock, a real estate agent. The vampire’s invasion of Wisborg is not a mythical curse but a real estate transaction gone horribly wrong. Unlike the claustrophobic, jagged alleys of The Cabinet